Identifying Operational Requirements to Select Suitable Decision Models for a Public Sector E-Procurement Decision Support System

Mohamed Adil, Miguel Baptista Nunes, Guo Chao Peng

Resumo


Public sector procurement should be a transparent and fair process. Strict legal requirements are enforced on public sector procurement to make it a standardised process. To make fair decisions on selecting suppliers, a practical method which adheres to legal requirements is important. The research that is the base for this paper aimed at identifying a suitable Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) method for the specific legal and functional needs of the Maldivian Public Sector. To identify such operational requirements, a set of focus group interviews were conducted in the Maldives with public officials responsible for procurement decision making. Based on the operational requirements identified through focus groups, criteria-based evaluation is done on published MCDA methods to identify the suitable methods for e-procurement decision making. This paper describes the identification of the operational requirements and the results of the evaluation to select suitable decision models for the Maldivian context.

Palavras-chave


Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA); Decision Model; Focus Group; Public Sector; e-Procurement

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


Aghajani, M., & Hadi-Vencheh, A. (2011). A multiple attribute decision making model in the presence of grey numbers. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Advanced Management Science, Singapore.

Amponsah, C. T. (2011). Application of multi-criteria decision making process to determine critical success factors for procurement of capital projects under public-private partnerships. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 3(2), 107-129.

Arrowsmith, S., & Anderson, R. D. (Eds.). (2011). The WTO regime on government procurement: challenge and reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Baily, P., Farmer, D., Jessop, D., & Jones, D. (1994). Purchasing Principles and Management (7th ed.). London: Pitman Publishing.

Barbour, R. S., & Kitzinger, J. (Eds.). (1999). Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice. London: SAGE.

Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2002). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Dordrecht Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Bottani, E., & Rizzi, A. (2006). A fuzzy TOPSIS methodology to support outsourcing of logistics services. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(4), 294-308.

Brown, R. B., Wright, R. D. J., Cloke, C. G., Morris, T. B., & Trumper, I. F. S. (1984). Government purchasing : a multi-department review of government contract and procurement procedures. London: HMSO.

Chamodrakas, I., Leftheriotis, I., & Martakos, D. (2011). In-depth analysis and simulation study of an innovative fuzzy approach for ranking alternatives in multiple attribute decision making problems based on TOPSIS. Applied Soft Computing, 11(1), 900-907.

Chen, S., Osman, M., & Peng, G. C. (2012). Information systems evaluation: methodologies and practical case studies. In P. Isaias & J. M. B. Nunes (Eds.), Information systems research and exploring social artifacts: Approaches and methodologies. Hershey, USA: IGI Global.

Dhaulathuge Maaliyyathu Gaanoonu 2006 (Maldives).

Dhaulathuge Maaliyyathuge Gavaaidhu 2009 (Maldives).

England, W. B. (1967). The purchasing system. Homewood, Illinois: Irwin.

Falagario, M., Sciancalepore, F., Costantino, N., & Pietroforte, R. (2012). Using a DEA-cross efficiency approach in public procurement tenders. European Journal of Operational Research, 218(2), 523-529.

Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). London: SAGE.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

Guitouni, A., & Martel, J.-M. (1998). Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. European Journal of Operational Research, 109(2), 501-521.

Huang, S.-l. (2011). Designing utility-based recommender systems for e-commerce: Evaluation of preference-elicitation methods. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 10(4), 398–407.

Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfi, F. H., & Davoodi, A. R. (2009). Extension of TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data: Interval efficiency. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 49(5-6), 1137-1142.

Krueger, R. A. (1998). Analyzing and reporting focus group results. London: Sage.

Leenders, M. R., & Fearon, H. E. (1997). Purchasing and supply management (7th ed.). Chicago: Irwin.

Lloyd-Evans, S. (2006). Focus groups. In V. Desai & R. B. Potter (Eds.), Doing development research (pp. 153-162). London: Sage publication.

Min, H. (1994). International supplier selection: A multi-attribute utility approach. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 24(5), 24-33.

Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.

Moshkovich, H., Mechitov, A., & Olson, D. (2005). Verbal decision analysis. In J. Figueira, S. Greco & M. Ehrgott (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision analysis : state of the art surveys (pp. 609-637). Boston: Springer.

Olson, D. L. (2004). Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40, 721-727.

Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455.

Rowlinson, S., & McDermott, P. (Eds.). (1999). Procurement Systems: A guide to best practice in construction. London: E & FN Spon.

Sanayei, A., Mousavi, S. F., Abdi, M. R., & Mohaghar, A. (2008). An integrated group decision-making process for supplier selection and order allocation using multi-attribute utility theory and linear programming. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 345(7), 731–747.

Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-criteria decision making methods : a comparative study. Dordrecht ; Boston, Mass.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Tsaur, R.-C. (2011). Decision risk analysis for an interval TOPSIS method. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218(8), 4295–4304.

Weele, A. J. v. (2000). Purchasing and supply chain management : analysis, planning and practice (2nd ed.). London: Business Press.

Weele, A. J. v. (2010). Purchasing and supply chain management : analysis, strategy, planning and practice (5th ed.). Andover: Cengage Learning.