SUSTAINABILITY IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: AN ANALYSIS OF THE ASPECTS CONSIDERED IN THE MODEL COBIT

Marcia Cristina Machado, Flavio Hourneaux Junior, Fernanda Aparecida Sobral

Abstract


Parallel to the development of technology in its different fronts and particularly about the various applications of Information Technology (IT), another trend that has been consolidated in organizations is the search for sustainability. There are initiatives such as Green IT, Sustainable IT, and Green software that combine these two elements (IT and sustainability). In this context, this study aims to identify the presence of sustainability aspects in the COBIT (Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies) model of IT management. Thus, this article seeks to verify if and how versions 4.1 and 5 of the COBIT model—which guide IT managers in the alignment of technical activities with the organization's strategy—are related to sustainability, through the use of sustainability indicators defined by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) as a representative proxy of sustainability aspects necessary for the user organization of the model. This exploratory research makes use of documental research and presents the following main results: (1) partial alignment of the COBIT model with the generic categories of the GRI, especially the governance category; and (2) it highlights the small relation of this model with broader environmental and social aspects in the same way that it presents relationship limitations with economic aspects evaluated by the GRI.

Keywords


Information technology (IT); Sustainable IT; COBIT maturity models; sustainability indicators; Global Reporting Initiative

Full Text:

PDF PDF

References


ABES. (2016). Mercado Brasileiro de Software - Panorama e Tendencias 2016. São Paulo, SP. http://doi.org/978-8586700-03-3.

Becker, J., Knackstedt, R., & Pöppelbuß, J. (2009). Developing Maturity Models for IT Management. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1(3), 213–222. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-009-0044-5.

Bener, A. B., Morisio, M., & Miranskyy, A. (2014). Green Software Introduction. IEEE Software, 31(3), 36–39.

Bose, R., & Luo, X. (2011). Integrative framework for assessing firms’ potential to undertake Green IT initiatives via virtualization–A theoretical perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(1), 38–54.

Bose, R., & Luo, X. R. (2012). Green IT adoption: a process management approach. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 20(1), 63–77.

BRASSCOM. (2014). Brasil TI-BPO BOOK. São Paulo, SP. Retrieved from http://www.brasscom.org.br.

Brown, H. S., De Jong, M., & Lessidrenska, T. (2009). The rise of the Global Reporting Initiative: a case of institutional entrepreneurship. Environmental Politics, 18(2), 182–200.

Campos, L. M. de S., Sehnem, S., Oliveira, M. de A. S., Rossetto, A. M., Coelho, A. L. de A. L., & Dalfovo, M. S. (2013). Sustainability report: profile of Brazilian and foreign organizations according to the Global Reporting Initiative guidelines. Gestão & Produção, 20(4), 913–926. http://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-530X2013005000013.

Canaltech. (2015). Investimentos em data centers crescem 40% com crise energética - Data Center, retrieved from https://corporate.canaltech.com.br/noticia/data-center/Investimentos-em-data-centers-crescem-40-com-crise-energetica/.

Chauhan, N. S., & Saxena, A. (2013). A Green Software Development Life Cycle for Cloud Computing. IT Professional, 15(1), 28–34.

Dao, V., Langella, I., & Carbo, J. (2011). From green to sustainability: Information Technology and an integrated sustainability framework. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(1), 63–79. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2011.01.002.

Debreceny, R. S., & Gray, G. L. (2013). IT Governance and Process Maturity: A Multinational Field Study. Journal of Information Systems, 27(1), 157–188. http://doi.org/10.2308/isys-50418.

Dingwerth, K., & Eichinger, M. (2010). Tamed transparency: How information disclosure under the Global Reporting Initiative fails to empower. Global Environmental Politics, 10(3), 74–96.

Faucheux, S., & Nicolaï, I. (2011). IT for green and green IT: A proposed typology of eco-innovation. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 2020–2027.

Ferreira, L. B., & Ramos, A. S. M. (2005). Tecnologia da Informação: commodity ou ferramenta estratégica. Revista de Gestão Da Tecnologia E Sistemas de Informação, 2(1), 69–79.

Harmon, R. R., & Auseklis, N. (2009). Sustainable IT services: Assessing the impact of green computing practices. In Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação (Vol. 5, pp. 1707–1717). IEEE. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=5261969.

Harmon, R. R., Demirkan, H., Auseklis, N., & Reinoso, M. (2010). From Green Computing to Sustainable IT: Developing a Sustainable Service Orientation. In 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 1–10). http://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.214.

Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014. http://doi.org/10.1002/smr.474.

Hart, S. L. (1997). Beyond greening: Strategies for a Sustainable World. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 66.

Hart, S. L., & Milstein, M. B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 56–67. http://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2003.10025194.

Hueting, R., & Reijnders, L. (2004). Broad sustainability contra sustainability: the proper construction of sustainability indicators. Ecological Economics, 50(3–4), 249–260. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.03.031.

ITGI, I. G. I. (2007). CoBIT 4.1. Illinois, USA: ITGT - IT Governance Institute. Retrieved from www.itgi.org.

ITGI, I. G. I. (2012). CoBIT 5 - Governança e Gestão de TI da Organização. Illinois, USA: ISACA- Information Systems Audit and Control Association. Retrieved from www.isaca.org.

Jones, P., Comfort, D., & Hillier, D. (2015). Managing materiality: a preliminary examination of the adoption of the new GRI G4 guidelines on materiality within the business community. Journal of Public Affairs. http://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1586.

Keeble, J. J., Topiol, S., & Berkeley, S. (2003). Using indicators to measure sustainability performance at a corporate and project level. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 149–158.

Klumb, R., & Azevedo, B. M. de. (2014). A percepção dos gestores operacionais sobre os impactos gerados nos processos de trabalho após a implementação das melhores práticas de governança de TI no TRE/SC. Revista de Administração Pública, 48(4), 961–982. http://doi.org/10.1590/0034-76121651.

Lakatos, E. M., & Marconi, M. de A. (1991). Metodologia científica. Atlas São Paulo.

Laurindo, F. J. B. (2008). Tecnologia da Informação: planejamento e gestão de estratégias. Atlas.

Levett, R. (1998). Sustainability indicators—integrating quality of life and environmental protection. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 161(3), 291–302. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-985X.00109.

Levy, D. L., Szejnwald Brown, H., & de Jong, M. (2010). The Contested Politics of Corporate Governance: The Case of the Global Reporting Initiative. Business & Society, 49(1), 88–115. http://doi.org/10.1177/0007650309345420.

Luciano, E. M., & Testa, M. G. (2011). Controles de Governança de Tecnologia da Informação para a terceirização de processos de negócio: Uma proposta a partir do COBIT. JISTEM Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 8(1), 237–262. http://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752011000100011.

Lunardi, G. L., Simões, R., & Frio, R. S. (2014). TI Verde: Uma análise dos principais benefícios e práticas utilizadas pelas organizações. Revista Eletrônica de Administração, 20(1), 1–30.

Mangalaraj, G., Singh, a, & Taneja, a. (2014). IT Governance Frameworks and COBIT-A Literature Review. Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems, 1–10. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2014/StrategicUse/GeneralPresentations/13/

Martins, G. de A., & Theóphilo, C. R. (2009). Metodologia da investigação científica para ciências sociais aplicadas. Atlas, 2.

Moeller, B., Erek, K., Loeser, F., & Zarnekow, R. (2013). How sustainable is COBIT 5? Insights from theoretical analysis and empirical survey data. In Procesdings of The Nineteenth Americas Conference on Informantion Systems (Vol. 3, pp. 1836–1844). Chigago, Illinois. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/record.

Molla, A. (2009). Organizational motivations for Green IT: Exploring Green IT matrix and motivation models. PACIS 2009 Proceedings, 13.

Molla, A., Cooper, V. A., & Pittayachawan, S. (2009). IT and eco-sustainability: Developing and validating a green IT readiness model. In ICIS 2009 Proceedings. Paper 141 (pp. 1–17).

Murugesan, S. (2008). Harnessing green IT: Principles and practices. IT Professional, 10(1), 24–33.

Naumann, S., Dick, M., Kern, E., & Johann, T. (2011). The GREENSOFT Model: A reference model for green and sustainable software and its engineering. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 1(4), 294–304. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2011.06.004.

OECD. (2010). Eco-Innovation in Industry. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 61.

Rashid, N., & Khan, S. U. (2014). Green agile maturity model for global software. Sci.Int.(lahore), 26(5), 2041–2043.

Siggins, P., & Murphy, C. (2009, April). Putting Green IT to Work for Corporate Sustainability [Text]. Retrieved August 10, 2015, from http://www.greenbiz.com/news/2009/04/07/putting-green-it-work-corporate-sustainability.

Standing, C., & Jackson, P. (2007). An approach to sustainability for information systems. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 9(2), 167–176. http://doi.org/10.1108/13287260710839247.

Taina, J. (2010). How green is your software? In Software Business (pp. 151–162). Springer.

Team, C. P. (2010). CMMI® for Development, Version 1.3 CMMI-DEV, V1.3. Retrieved from http://www.sei.cmu.edu.

Willis, A. (2003). The role of the global reporting initiative’s sustainability reporting guidelines in the social screening of investments. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(3), 233–237.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752017000100005

Licensed under